Engineering Design Portfolio
- Learn all the tools involved in creating a website rather than just making a website
- Present my accomplishments in a robust, usable, and efficient way
Understanding the Problem ¶
The first step was researching how building a website could be broken down and to that effect I consulted a classmate, Zhuowei Zhang, who had more web development experience. With permission, I used his November build as my starting point. I found the problem of building a website can be decomposed into:
Solution Pool ¶
In line with my engineering process, solutions for each problem component were generated.
- Content needs to be easily editable, not bogged down in syntax
- HTML: too much syntax; its strength in versatility may be useful though
- Markdown: although functionality is limited and requires parsing into HTML, great for the purpose of creating and maintaining content
- Layout needs to readable by all browsers, as quickly as possible
- HTML: pretty much the only choice, and the syntax is not a problem since there will only be one layout
- Styling needs to be supported by most browsers and easily changeable; loading speed (file size) is a consideration for first time visitors
- CSS: superior to HTML for styling in every way
- Hosting needs to be reliable, fast, and not place too many restrictions on usage
- ECF UToronto: very fast, but restricted to "satisfy(ing) the requirements of some web based courses"
- UTORweb: restricted to "individual use in support of one's role in the University"
- Google Sites: slower, but no restrictions on usage
- GithubPages: slower, but no restrictions on usage and provides server side Jekyll to parse markdown into HTML. Note that users are only viewing static HTML pages, markdown is parsed
Solution Comparison ¶
The combination that I selected was (Markdown + HTML) + CSS + Jekyll + GithubPages. Markdown does not natively support tables or CSS classes, so HTML is used to generate tables and picture frames. Jekyll is quite robust in being able to parse multiple languages in one file - a YAML header, HTML elements, and markdown elements. One area of improvement for Jekyll is to support markdown inside HTML div elements.
An important part of my engineering design process is comparing solutions against each other. Out of 256 portfolios posted by my classmates, 189 were made using Wix, 21 Wordpress, 20 Weebly. My current portfolio was compared against empty templates from Wix, Wordpress, and Weebly using the metric of no-cache first visit load time for efficiency. Usability can be partially measured by load time, but otherwise is more to do with layout and user-interface.
|Home page load time without caching (ms)
|Average time per request (ms)
The load times (including mine) are reduced to about 40% after first visit due to caching, but first impressions often make the greatest impact on user satisfaction.
An important aspect to reducing load time is reducing the number of HTTP requests. Each request carries overhead that is often greater than time spent on receiving data, as is the case for my home page.
Only 1ms spent on receiving data!
In light of this, Wix provides great hosting by having a low load time to requests made ratio; however, the relationship between request number and load time is not linear, and should be **considered along with total load time**. For me, these sites do not give enough control to the developer over what gimmicks the user has to face and thus is not robust enough.
Design Decisions for Usability ¶In my opinion, making a product more usable is almost equivalent to increasing its quality - the overall feel of the product. Attention to detail with the consideration of what could irk the users is key to my process of designing for usability. These are the key design decisions to make this site more usable:
- Table rows highlight on hover to easily track items belonging to the same row; I personally had this difficulty with data sheets (demonstrated here)
- Page anchors (¶) allow parts of the page to be redirected to; makes redirect links more relevant
- Site and page history at the footer of each page to allow anyone interested to see how I have progressed
- Dynamic scaling of page elements (including images) to accomodate for different monitor sizes and avoid stretching
- Subtle bump down of navigation bar links when activated to provide a more satisfying clicking experience
- Thumbnail of pictures with links to full-size versions where appropriate to reduce loading time
Example of embedding large images; 42s load time!
Prototyping ¶Developing for the web inherently makes it easy to prototype. Jekyll can serve the site locally and constantly regenerate each time an edit is made.
Rapid prototyping with Jekyll made easy
Polishing ¶Rapidly prototyping a product is fine for initial launch and ironing out bugs, but I believe great usability comes from long term polish. Nuances take time and usage to notice, therefore I will gradually add features to improve the quality of my portfolio.
Reverse email entry to protect against spam bots
Attention grabbing gallery
Visual and interactive flowchart for my process page
Gains from Experience ¶
- Understanding of the components to creating an efficient website
- Proficiency in CSS, HTML, and markdown
- Principles: designing for usability is attention to detail to provide a quality user experience